This standard of proof is much higher than the civil standard, called “ preponderance of the evidence,” which only requires a certainty greater than 50 percent.įor an article detailing the origins of this standard, download this University of Chicago Law Review article.įor Supreme Court cases related to this legal standard, see Patterson v. In other words, the jury must be virtually certain of the defendant’s guilt in order to render a guilty verdict. This means that the prosecution must convince the jury that there is no other reasonable explanation that can come from the evidence presented at trial. All persons are presumed to be innocent and no person may be convicted of an offense unless each element of the offense is. In a criminal case, the prosecution bears the burden of proving that the defendant is guilty beyond all reasonable doubt. In a criminal case, the prosecution bears the. It’s also important to note that each and every element of the crime must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt as well. Beyond a reasonable doubt is the legal burden of proof required to affirm a conviction in a criminal case. Beyond a reasonable doubt is the legal burden of proof required to affirm a conviction in a criminal case. Beyond A Reasonable Doubt definition: The standard for conviction in a criminal trial evidence sufficient to convince a reasonable person beyond doubt of the guilt of the defendant. There is some shadow of a doubt allowed it’s up to the jury to then decide how substantial that doubt is and if there’s any other explanation for the facts that point to the defendant’s possible innocence.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |